Inherit the Wind: Henry Drummond Essay

The authors, Jerome Lawrence and Robert E. Lees, principal(prenominal) habit through Inherit the Wind is proving that humans hold the right(a) to work out. Henry Drummond is vital in this discovery because of his firm belief that cardinal should hold this right. Drummonds hero archetype is the cause for his strong feelings, and he succeeds when convincing the audience of his beliefs by revealing the contradictions underlying his bill of farenesses inherited ghostlike beliefs. Henry Drummond arrives in Hillsboro as an atheist, and leaves as a hero. The townspeoples initial reaction to the news that Drummond is defending Cates, alerts the audience. This is most apparent when Melinda, a young girl, first sees him and screams Its the Devil (Lawrence and Lee ). Drummond does not let the citizens misconstrued interpretation of him distract him from his goal, to take a stand. Drummond uses the fibre as an opportunity to fight for the right to think and develop ones own truths.Slowly the townspeople begin to see through Brady and start to see the true Drummond. The Drummond who is committed to defending Cates and respects Cates for standing up when everybody else is sitting down.(Lawrence and Lee ). Brady and Drummond are alike in multiple ship canal such as their mutual respect for each other as well as their past together, but there are as well as very significant differences between them, such as their character. Drummonds mind to defend Cates is to share a message throughout the world as well as protect an innocent man. Meanwhile Bradys purpose is to gain popularity throughout the world, and only to help himself. Bradys lack of commitment towards this case results in his downfall. In Act III of the play, the readers see Drummonds quick mind, his ability to function under pressure, and his creativity. When the judge refuses all of Drummonds witnesses he switches tactics and decides to call Brady to the stand as an expert on the bible.Drummonds character s erves as a foil for Bradys character, Drummonds patient demeanor and open-minded, progressive way of thinking accentuates Bradys shockable way of thinking which causes the audiences support in his direction and opens their eyes to truth. The window pane where the Drummonds rank is finally made is when he stumps Brady. Drummonds cross-examination of Brady causes dismay and hysteria. Brady self-destructs when his convictions about the literal truth of the Bible are questioned and proved off due to Drummond. Drummonds attack of Brady is not mean-spirited, it isdevastating. At the comparable time, the exponent of Drummonds attack stems not so much from Drummonds wit as from the weight of Bradys egotism, stubbornness, and arrogance.Basically if Brady was not so self-assertive and arrogant he might have been able to prevent the case going the way it did. Although the trial in Inherit the Wind concerns the meshing between creationism and evolutionism, a deeper conflict exists bene ath the surface. Drummond points to this more basic bit when he asks his young witness Howard whether he believes in Darwin. When the boy responds that he hasnt made up his mind, Drummond insists that the boys freedom to thinkto make up his own mindis what is actually on trial. This point in the book is where Drummonds point becomes obvious freedom of thought process becomes the freedom to be wrong or to change ones mind.Even though Cates is found guilty, Drummond wins a moral victory. He reveals his impartiality when he defends freedom of thought, even for those he disagrees with. When Hornbeck criticizes Brady and Bradys fundamentalist beliefs, Drummond tells Hornbeck that . . . Brady had the same right as Cates the right to be wrong (Lawrence and Lee ) Drummonds hero archetype and his initial analysis of Brady are the cause of his advantage with the people of Hillsboro. At the end of the play, Drummond feels the same way and is still conflict for peoples right to be wrong ( Lawrence and Lee ).