God and Philosophy Essay

Many philosophers bequeath say that immortal plays an all- strategic(a) role in a persons mental being. Others will argue that he doesnt and that we decide by our own mentality. The trinity thinkers that will be discussed in this paper made a bigger imp solve in the philosophic world with their theories and reasons. Descartes, Kant, and Hume be all master(prenominal) players in the world of philosophy, but according to other philosophers, so is divinity fudge. Rene Descartes, a noned French philosopher, scientist, and mathematician, coined the Latin phrase Cogito ergo sum (I think, thusly I am).He refused to accept the scholastic and Aristotelian traditions that had dominated philosophical thought throughout the medieval period (www. iep. utm. edu). He frequently contrasted his views with those of his predecessors. In his theology, he insists on the absolute freedom of perfections act of creation. In 1641, he wrote Mediations on First Philosophy, which he employed a method called methodological skepticism where he doubts any idea that nookie be doubted.God, in Descartes metaphysics, is the bridge from the subjective world of thought to the accusing world of scientific truth. The mind, owing its existence to God, is innately programmed with certain ideas that tick off to reality hence the importance, in Descartes system, of proving the existence of God, the perfect guarantor of our ideas, so that the mediator can move from isolated flashes of cognition to systematic familiarity of the nature of reality (Cottingham, 31).In Meditations, he mentions the idea of a tender-heartede God. Because God is benevolent, he can withstand some faith in the account of reality his senses leave with a working mind and sensory(a) system and does not desire to deceive him however, this is a continuous argument, as his actually notion of a benevolent God from which he substantial this argument is easily subject to the same kind of doubt as his perceptions (www. wikipedia. com).Descartes sought to retain the belief in the existence of innate ideas unneurotic with an acceptance of the values of data and ideas derived from an experience. Next up is Immanuel Kant, a German philosopher that held that there is an objective moral law. Most philosophers view faith very differently. Some think there is an objective moral law, but that it depends on Gods will. Others thought morality was to do with reason, but that the conclude was all about how to promote some objective, like ones own happiness of welfare of society (Walker, 5).Kant rejected these ideas, because morality is depending on something outside itself- Gods will. Kant inquired whether it could be possible to ground synthetic substance ? a priori knowledge for a study of metaphysics, because most of the principles of metaphysics from Plato through Kants immediate predecessors made assertions about the world or about God or about the soul. Kants works of 1755 reveal more of his origina lity and his put up themes.Universal inherent History, deriving the present state of the planets from postulated initial conditions by reiterated applications of the laws of Newtonian mechanics, manifests not only Kants commitment to those laws, for which he was later to seek philosophical foundations, but also his commitment to thoroughly realistic bills in science, in which God can be the initial generator of natural laws but never intervenes within the sequence of physical causes. Kant serene holds that the existence of God can be proved as a condition of the possibility of any reality.Finally, Kant further develops his argument that scientific explanation cannot allow predict intervention in the sequence of events, and that God moldiness be seen only as the original ground of the laws of nature. The existence of God is therefore to Kant a necessary assumption for what he sees to be an objectively valid morality. Lastly, David Hume, British philosopher, is considered one o f the most influential religious philosophers. Hume questioned the work on of inductive thinking, which had been the hallmark of science.He criticized the standard proofs for Gods existence, traditional notions of Gods nature and divine governance, the connection between morality and religion, and the rationality of belief in miracles. He also advanced theories on the origin of popular religious beliefs, grounding such notions in human psychology rather than in rational argument or divine revelation. For Hume, all objects of human reason are divided into two kinds traffic of Ideas and Matters of fact. All reasoning of matters of fact is founded on Cause and motion.Cause and Effect play a big role in Humes philosophy. Hume wrote The Natural History of Religion in 1757. Its main theme is the causes and consequences of the religious ontogeny of mankind from polytheism to monotheism. Belief in a god or gods is not natural like belief in an external world, since there are races in wh ich it is not to be found (Quinton, 52). Contrary to many critiques Hume does rely that there is a God, however he does not believe that God is all greatness like society commonly holds and accepts.Hume argues that because one sees an onus that doesnt mean that we can automatically know or assume its cause. This argument can be used to explain the creation of the world. As influential as Hume was, he remains an academic skeptic, making the commonsensical judgments of an ordinary life, regardless of lack of academic knowledge. God played an important role in every philosophers thinking. They either tried to provide proof that he does or does not exist, or tried to line why so many people followed a man whom they have never even met.Nevertheless, God played an important role in Kants, Descartes, and Humes philosophical thinking. Works Cited Burnham, Douglas and James Fieser. Rene Descartes (1596-1650). The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2005. http//www. iep. utm. edu/d/de scarte. htm. Cottingham, John. Descartes. New York, Rutledge 1999. Quinton, Anthony. Hume. New York, Rutledge 1999. Rene Descartes. http//en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Descartes. Walker, Ralph. Kant. New York, Rutledge 1999.