Against Animal Experimentation Essay -- social issues

Against puppet experimentationImagine having a headache and non having acetylsalicylic acid to take, or being diabetic and not being subject to take certain types of insulin (Williams 3). It seems impossible that these drugs could be unavailable to manhood, but they would not be attainable had scientists not tried and true these drugs on non- sentient being subjects. Contrary to what legion(predicate) people believe, testing drugs on living organisms often give defective results. more than than 205,000 new drugs atomic number 18 marketed worldwide every year, about undergo the most archaic and unreliable testing methods still in use sentient being studies (PETA 1). Although animals may seem the like ideal specimens for testing new drugs, the experiments ar untrustworthy and locoweed cause unknown slope effects. Research on animals is deemed necessary to develop vaccines, treatments, and cures for diseases and to ensure that new products atomic number 18 safe for adu lt males to use. The development of immunization against such diseases as polio, diphtheria, mumps, measles, rubella, pertussis, and hepatitis all involved inquiry on animals (AMPEF 1). Scientists have found many drugs by means of animal experimentation. To some people, animals are viewed as better test subjects than anything else. Scientists can check off many aspects in an animals life such as their diet, the temperature, lighting, environment, and more. Animals are biologically similar, but not identical to military man and can form some of the same health problems. When these health problems are injected into an animal it can have the same physical reactions as a human could. Brettner -2- Experimenting on animals, to some, is important if humans want to continue with improving our checkup advances (AMPEF 1). Although animals have helped form useful medicines for humans like anesthesia, they have likewise helped put dangerous drugs on the market (AMPEF 1). Practolol, a drug for nervus disorders that passed animal test was pulled off the shelves when the drug caused blindness in people. Also, arsenic, which is harmful and causes cancer in humans, has not caused cancer in any animals that were tested (PETA 1). According to the General Accounting Office, more than half of the prescription drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) between 1976 and 1985 caused serious side effects that later caused the drugs to be either relabeled or removed from the market. Drugs app... ... are many other ways to get the same results as humans receive from animal experiments. These methods are viewed as more moral, practical, effective, and less expensive, why wouldnt we use these methods? By using these methods, scientists were able to invent aspirin and certain types of insulin (Williams 3). Although animals may seem like the ideal specimen for experimenting with, these experiments are untrustworthy and can cause unknown side effects. Works Cited AMPE F. post Counterpoint. Americans For Medical Progress Education Foundation. 1998. 4 whitethorn 2002. Best, Lonnie Lee. are Humans Animals? The Hardcore Truth. 1998. 1 May 2002. British Anti-Vivisection Association. Animal Experimentation No Lie Can Live Forever. 2 May 2002. Cohen, Et. Al. A Critical Look at Animal Experimentation. 1998. 3 May 2002. People For the Ethical Treatment of Animals. Animal Experimentation. PETA. 2001. 4 May 2002. Thacher, Wendy. Chimpanzees Test Results That Dont Apply To Humans. PCRM Animal Experimentation Issues. September 2, 1999. 5 May 2002. Williams, Joy. Do Creatures Have The resembling Rights That We Do? Harpers Magazine. 1997. 6 May 2002.