Pitbulls Should Be Banned

The issue whether stigmatizebulls should be banned has been prominent in the media in recent weeks since unequal Ayen Chol was brutally firinged. In the letter to the editorial these dogs atomic number 18 guns without a safety catch published in the betoken sun, on the 19/08/11, by Leanne Pelen contends that collierybulls ar vicious, savage, dangerous animals that need to be banned by the government. In an outraged tone, the article targets those who own pitbulls as well the government bump officials who make the laws about dogs, in a hollo to get them to see that pitbulls are vicious killers who are to have no pace in our society.Throughout the article the writer uses a number of convincing devices in order to manipulate the audiences response. These hold metaphors, anecdotal evidence, repetition, rhetorical unbelief, rape and affective phrase. In the heading, one vitrine of a persuasive technique used is that of a metaphor. A metaphor is when the cause makes asso ciation with a vivid image. An guinea pig of this technique throughout the article include these dogs are guns without a safety catch on.It manipulates the referee in creating a sense of fear by using the powerful image of a dangerous deadly weapon and associating this image with pitbulls such abduces have go away the reader to believe that pitbulls are dangerous, vicious, brutal dogs that should be banned. Another example of a persuasive technique used that is of attack to the government, an attack is when the write position the reader to agree that if an individual is flawed, their messages must be to, an example of this technique throughout the article include has the law gone worked up? and How little the government will protect us.. this attack makes the reader sapidity outraged that the government in doing little to help the community. The agent uses emotive language to describe the hardyry of her husband and the innocence of the young misfire Ayen Chol. An example o f this highly emotive language throughout the article include acting so bravely without thought of his own safety, this quote make the reader feel admiration of how the husbands brave action and relief that he was there in order to forestall a atastrophic event for his family . Another use of this highly emotive language include where the other victim young Ayen Chol was described as poor little girl, the use of poor little girl makes the reader feel sympathy for a young victim barely started her life, the author creates a petrifying image as she frantically tries to fight off the dog, as she clung to her mothers leg the author to a fault manipulates the reader in feeling penetrating grief that this disparaging attack couldve been avoided had happen in someones lounge room.With a serial publication of highly emotive language, for example the terms used to describe the dogs as these vicious dogs, savagely behaviour, and their murderous aggression. Not only(prenominal) does the auth or use these words she also inclines the reader to see that these dogs are nothing but dangerous ruthless killers with no mercy, and to agree with the author in asserting that these dogs should be banned. Reference to the well-known authority of RSPCA express president Hugh Wirth sways us to accept that these dogs are indeed ruthless creates as he describes the pit bulls as killing machines.Dr Stephen Tate, a veterinarian and manager of the Bureau of Animal Welfare at the Department of Primary Industries says pit bulls were specifically bred to be dangerous when they attack. This predisposes the reader that also the experts know that pit bulls are vicious, brutal and dangerous. The author concludes this article with a rhetorical question when will these people learn that we need to treat these breeds like guns without a safety catch on, this rhetorical question is also a repetition of the metaphor which appeared in the headline.